Hosted by Orcon

Made with Macintosh

Kiwi Blog

O.R.C. Horde Member

Kiwi Grenadier

Kiwi and Australian troops in East Timor

 

Defence Issues

Air Defence Company

Annual Report

Close Air Support

Defence Debate

Defence Matters

Infantry Battalion

Letter to Minister

[ Maritime Forces ]

NZLAV

Project Protector

[ Reconnaissance ]

[ Recruitment ]

News

Al Jazeera

BBC World News

Washington Post

Film

Blade Runner

Boba Fett Fan Club

Das Experiment

Ghost Dog

Internet Movie Database

James Bond 007

La Femme Nikita

Pans Labyrinth

Reading Cinemas

Weta FX

Television

Babylon 5

Battlestar Galactica

Farscape

NCIS

MacGyver

Muppets

Stargate Atlantis

Stargate SG-1

The Unit

Writers

Andy McNab

Douglas Adams

J.R.R. Tolkien

Keith Stokes

Philip K. Dick

William Gibson

Sport

Air Gun Designs

Northland Rugby

V8 Supercars

Additional Links

Apple Computers

CentCom

Google

HK Pro

Investigate Magazine

New Zealand Army

Nik Kershaw

Real Groovy

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

Shihad

Swiss Army

US Cav

The NZDF Files - Effective Air Defence for Deployed Forces

10 October 2007

Proposal of RNZAF Air Defence Company

New Zealand Defence Forces are severely vulnerable to air attack with only a limited capacity to protect its airspace against such threats. With the disbandment of the Combat Air Wing this has been infinitely increased. If we are unable to meet even a minimal threat of such nature out at sea, as the Skyhawks allowed, then as a cheaper but less effective counter to this problem Air Defence options is proposed.

This would consist of several batteries along our vast coastline. More critical and pressing is protection of operationally deployed units. The RNZAF would operate such forces in close cooperation with enhanced Army assets increasing interoperational capacity. All options can also be mounted on vehicles for higher levels of mobility and deployment.Such an option becomes even more pertinent with the disbanding of the Air Combat Wing. With both static and mobile forces of this kind we can have an adequate defence against incoming air attack. This does negate an ability to strike at any threat out at sea, but it does provide with additional early warning. Matched to Electronic Warfare (EW) of the RNZN this would provide the best means of national defence outside of reinstating an offensive air capacity.

It must be stressed, for a country of the geographical disposition of New Zealand, the best defence is good offence, the battle being fought out at sea, where our land assets, both civil and military, are at minimal risk.

New Zealand has not only a long reaching coastline but also distant strategic responsibilities to its neighbours. This strategic concern is intrinsically linked with trade and an ability to demonstrate the willingness to maintain these wider global concerns. The Navy gives New Zealand the ability, given appropriate assets, to provide anything from civil defence duties in outlying islands to providing direct security to military or humanitarian relief as has been demonstrated with East Timor.

It is accepted that to raise such a unit poses problems due to the challenges faced in regards retention and recruitment but, particularly for deployed forces, and issues of full spectrum force protection this can not be ignored.Regards vehicles for mobile units, 1RNZIR has the majority of NZLAV assets for mobilisation. The remainder constitute use for 2/1RNZIR, training and, theoretically armoured recce. Some of these vehicles, perhaps two six vehicle batteries and four additional for command and control would allow for a realistic and affordable anti-air component to the force. Ideally additional vehicles would be brought for the purpose but the aforementioned considers minimal cost and integration.

A proposed force would consist of three troops. One based in Auckland / Whenuapai, one in Linton / Ohakea and another in Christchurch / Burnham. The two North Island units would be drawn from the FSV roled LAV based in Linton presently. The South Island unit would be drawn from the QAMR.

Each of the three troops would consist of:

4x Air Defence (AD) armed LAV
1x Direct Fire (DF) 25mm turret armed LAV
1x Command Post (CP) LAV
4x LOV

The DF vehicle will have the usual 3+7 compliment for rapid mounted / dismounted reconnaissance, while the LOV will each have 1+5 for ammunition, logistical and troop self protection duties. Typical personnel per troop would be 57, of enhanced platoon in size.

The 18 vehicles would simply be re-roled from those allocated as of the Army's plan of 28 June 2004. They would be staffed by RNZAF and a NZ Army cadre. The concept provides a dual role of air cover for Army assets and air defence for air ports and Air Force assets.What follows is a brief on three possible systems:

Rapier

Rapier is used by Australia's 16 Air Defence (Light) Regiment 110 AD Battery. It is due for replacement in Australian service and it would be worth considering purchasing these weapons off Australia as a interim measure. They are still a viable option for another decade or more and this is purely a self defence acquisition for defending our lengthy coastline from air attack. Used with great effect in the Falklands, this system has a modern upgrade path, as shown with the UK Rapier 2000.

Logistics,initial training and support can be provided by either the UK or Australia.

Units like Singapore's Air Defence Brigade of the RSAF, whom are responsible for national air defence operations, use Rapier. Rapier is a battle tested system and has a solid record. Portable variants for mobility are available.

Swiss Rapier

Bofors RSB-70/90

This missile system is used by Australia's 16 Air Defence (Light) Regiment 111 AD Battery. This laser guided SAM is also used by the RSAF Divisional Air Defence Artillery Brigade. ARMAD is a three man turret version which holds the radar and Fire Control System (FCS) needed for self contained operation. It is let down by its relatively short range of five kilometres but RSB-70 is man portable, while also being more typically mounted on light vehicles. The RSB-90 has a greater range and more effective warhead thanks to the advances of technology.

Rbs70 of Australia's 16 AD (Light) Regt. 111 Air Defence Battery

ADATS

Air Defence Anti-tank System uses a dual purpose warhead meaning the system can engage both Armour and air targets, out to a range of 10 kilometres, while detection is over twice that. The platform has eight laser guided missiles ready for launch. Two men can reload the ADATS without need for additional logistical support. A six unit battery can be linked to a common network, elements upto 20 kilometres apart sharing battlefield data. Both armoured mobile and static defence options are available.

With NZLAV now in service the Army could most certainly look into the feasibility of placing the weapons and targeting systems of ADATS onto these vehicles.

Switzerland use the ADATS on wheeled vehicles. It would provide a solid standoff engagement of any modern armoured vehicles. Main Battle Tanks have typical main gun range of three kilometres. Such a system therefore permits much greater protection of the asset. It also provides (mounted on NZLAV) a rapid deployment with the force it intends to protect. This compliments Javelin MAAW dismounted 2000 metre range.

Both Canada and the Royal Thai Air Force use ADATS, as well as Switzerland. The system is a joint project between Switzerland and Canada through Oerlikon Aerospace Inc. A Mk2 ADATS updating of technologies will keep this option on the leading edge of the battlefield for many years to come.

It should be stressed that, if the multi-role ADATS was adopted, the FSV role would persist, with the given vehicles simply in the Anti-tank role with increased range and lethality.

ADATS mounted on M113

Top ^

Contact

Admin

Miscellaneous

Words

Gaming

Units

Military

Additional Links

Associated Sites

Kiwi Made

 
Shemagh

 

Tarrackin's Home Scroll
http://juni0r.orconhosting.net.nz
Copyright (c) Leon T. Harrison 1996-2009. All Rights Reserved.

HK G36K