Hosted by Orcon

Made with Macintosh

Kiwi Blog

O.R.C. Horde Member

Kiwi Grenadier

Weeping Willow

 

Soap Box

Anti-smacking Bill

Bali Bombing

Clean Green?

Defence Matters

Letters to the Editor

London Bombings

Lords of War

NZLAV

Peace and Equality

Post 9/11

Protests

Swiss Model

News

Al Jazeera

BBC World News

Washington Post

Film

Blade Runner

Boba Fett Fan Club

Das Experiment

Ghost Dog

Internet Movie Database

James Bond 007

La Femme Nikita

Pans Labyrinth

Reading Cinemas

Weta FX

Television

Babylon 5

Battlestar Galactica

Farscape

NCIS

MacGyver

Muppets

Stargate Atlantis

Stargate SG-1

The Unit

Writers

Andy McNab

Douglas Adams

J.R.R. Tolkien

Keith Stokes

Philip K. Dick

William Gibson

Sport

Air Gun Designs

Northland Rugby

V8 Supercars

Additional Links

Apple Computers

CentCom

Google

HK Pro

Investigate Magazine

New Zealand Army

Nik Kershaw

Real Groovy

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

Shihad

Swiss Army

US Cav

Clean Green New Zealand - Yeah Right

February 2007

Our clean green image is a farce. One need only look as far as the levels of mercury in New Zealand waters and our lack of recycling for examples. And so it is with our military prestige. Once something to be revered, it is now, in less than a generation, degraded, rundown and sorely lacking in experienced personnel due to an exodus which began after East Timor. It only perpetuated after the disbandment of the Combat Air Wing of the RNZAF, which destroyed our airborne offensive capacity once and for all, and has continued with the adoption of the NZLAV and many soldiers in the Army voting with their feet.

Issues like pay rates were only dealt with at the last possible moment. East Timor found the military in the media forefront, exactly where the government wishes it was not. So, as a result, the public gains temporary awareness, and the government predictably looks to find favour and ensure some sort of pay equity with our Australian counterparts.

The first directive of any Defence Force of any nation is the defence of its people, its territory and the upholding of those values it claims to hold dear. This then extends to the region in which it considers itself part. Other requirements are secondary. The New Zealand Defence Force directives are now so manipulated by government that few can recall its inherent purpose.

If war on New Zealand territory, or even in the South Pacific is difficult to imagine, then perhaps a capacity to affect a proper response to even a mild nationwide civil emergency would have more personal impact.

In 2002 I proposed a terrorist scenario to the then Defence Minister Mark Burton. In his mandatory reply there was no acknowledgment of it. A somewhat simplified version goes like this:

A single C-130 aircraft carries 80 operatives into New Zealand airspace. In small groups they parachute into several strategic locations. Each is willing to make the ultimate sacrifice in an agenda few of us could comprehend. Each carries a rifle, 300 rounds of ammunition and adequate explosives for their appointed tasks. Critical infrastructure is hit in rapid succession. After their primary missions are completed they systematically expend their ammunition on innocent civilians, continuing until such time as they are caught or killed by local authorities.

The Mercury power crisis was an accident and not the result of malicious deliberate well-executed military action. Our allies could not respond with significant weight, nor should they considering we are unable to make reasonable efforts for our own self-defence. This demonstrates just how out of touch politicians, in general, are with prevailing issues of Defence and regional security.

With the Russians beginning to press a claim to the Arctic, the Chinese likewise press their own claims, no matter how subtle, towards the Antarctic. It may be an illusive matter of geography for those in power, but New Zealand is the only substantial landmass between Australia and the ice.It seems the Americans have a far better grasp of the strategic situation this creates than the greater majority of New Zealanders. Benign strategic situations might exist somewhere in the world of which I am unacquainted, but it is certainly nowhere in the Pacific with which I am familiar. Global experts certainly beg to differ with the Labour party viewpoint. The problem with clouds is, they don't always have silver linings. If you are caught in this kind of storm you need more than an old oil skin.

Many cite geographical isolation as justification for a degenerate attitude towards Defence issues. World War One found us under attack by German ships, including one named Komet. World War Two, likewise was no less a dilemma with the Japanese on our very doorstep. Well prior to that, fear of the Russians had some severe investments in coastal defences installed. This includes the famous Armstrong disappearing gun. So, in the age of the supersonic jet fighter, midair refuelling and airborne assaults, I do wonder who exactly advises our current government on strategic concerns.

Drawing on the basic terrorist scenario above, we have no air defence to speak of. There is no airborne counter. Naval assets must be in the right place at the right time. Even the Mistral man portable air defence missile system brought for the NZ Army in 1999 (one might suggest reactionary spending in relation to East Timor) is a dire last-ditch option for ground forces.

There is no Close Air Support for our new NZLAVs. That leaves our ground troops horrifically exposed to attack from the air. There is no acceptable level of air defence, thereby permitting a relatively simple invasion of our airspace to turn into a nightmare at the hands of less than 100 well-motivated extremists.

In common terms, this is like going to a doctor and expecting him to work on you with a hacksaw and nail clippers. You would expect your mechanic to have a socket set when he went to work on your car. Yet, by default, this nation expects those in its Defence Forces to defend it, to deter conflict, or rescue it from civil disaster in just such a manner.

Only when damage is visited upon our peace-loving state do people take seriously the issues of defence, or the capabilities unique to the Armed Forces for such contingencies. But then it is too late. Selfishness means such concerns are only considered when the consequences become personal.

Let me assure you, war is very personal when it is on your own streets. Politicians can visit war zones all over the world... but they can as easily leave. In this generation, they most certainly are incapable of envisioning what they see elsewhere occurring in their own hometown.

Those who truly love peace are willing to make the investment in maintaining that peace through reasonable deterrence, regional cooperation in security and an honest appraisal of global matters. Most nations either have a recent historical grasp of the issues, or are stuck right in the middle of set-piece examples. New Zealand has neither. One can dream for a while, but eventually it is time to wake up. If you wake to a nightmare you most certainly will not be able to get back to sleep.

In the real world, aggressors bide their time, they watch and wait. Real needs override treaties, goodwill and any sense of right and wrong. A nation either accepts this and works within a framework to ensure they are not preyed upon, thus ensuring the rest of the world sees their willingness to protect those things they hold dear, or they fall victim to the age-old human condition - belligerence.

Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Idi Amin and countless other examples in history did not see reason. To believe that the contemporary world is any different is hardly wise. Several millennia of civilisation (if you can call it that) proves our inability to gain that which we desire the most.

Defence is a national concern and must be addressed. We teach our children not to fight, but this should not forgo them learning how to defend themselves. The streets are not safe at night. A personal alarm is good. So are friends to walk us home, self-defence lessons, lit paths and money for a taxi. Don't expect your country to forgo such things in an increasingly violent world.

Our Defence Forces have been slowly retrograded towards a “peacekeeper only” force, their warfighting capacity moulded to this purpose alone. The government counts on a naive and complacent public for such short-sighted policies to be put in place, thereafter permitting them to perpetuate.

The government is meant to serve the people. The Armed Forces are in place to serve their nation yet having scant capacity to do so. This is a bill, for our families, our loved ones, our nation and our future, we can ill afford to ignore.

While one gets to vote but once a term, a voter has the constant right to demand even the most basic services of any kind. The state of any military in the West directly reflects the state of its nation's economy, its will, and its sense of self. As a nation we have a great deal of work to do.

Tarrackin's Home Scroll
http://juni0r.orconhosting.net.nz
Copyright (c) Leon T. Harrison 1996-2009. All Rights Reserved.

Contact

Admin

Miscellaneous

Words

Gaming

Units

Military

Additional Links

Associated Sites

Kiwi Made

 
Fiordland, New Zealand

 
Kiwi Flag

Tarrackin's Home Scroll
http://juni0r.orconhosting.net.nz
Copyright (c) Leon T. Harrison 1996-2009. All Rights Reserved.

HK G36K